Andrew & Esther - Through Our Eyes Archive
Our Thoughts

November 3, 2005
Are You Emerging?
Postmoderns. The Emergent Church. Am I the only one that feels like the entire evangelical world is trying to figure out who these people are and what these phrases mean?

Christianity Today ran a cover story on the “Emergent Mystique” in Nov. 2004. Countless books seeking to explain or even attack the "emergents" have already been written...and no doubt many more will be. Churches are being planted specifically to target the "post-moderns", and existing churches are adding "post-modern" worship services. And now, as final proof of the extreme buzz about the emergents...I am blogging about it. When I pickup a story, you know it's real news. (note: For those of you who don't know me, insert sarcasm while reading that sentence.)

So what's the deal? Why all this hubbub? Is it much ado about nothing? Kind of.

I think what people are noticing is a growing disconnect among young adults (around 18-30) in the evangelical church. What the church has been doing somehow isn't connecting with these folks...attendance and involvement in church activities etc. is dwindling. So everyone is trying to figure out what's going on.

Brian McLaren and Dan Kimball enter the scene. They write a few books, and the "emergent" label sticks. The books challenge a lot of the traditional way evangelicals "do" church, and lots of people buy the books. Somewhere amidst all of this, the "emerging church" label sticks.

At the heart of all this talk about the postmoderns, emergents, or whatever you want to call them...is an attempt to create a nice Webster-like definition of the emergent church. Frankly, there are a bunch of definitions out there...and for every definition there seems to be a criticism from some Christian leader who has been warily watching the emergent craze, unsure of what it's really about, but given a firm "definition" they have something to criticise. And then of course every movement has to have a leader...so there's been constant attempts to define who the emerging church leaders are. McLaren and Kimball are on most of the lists, but then again, McLaren refuses to call the whole thing a "movement". He calls it a "conversation", and he is just one participant in the conversation, not a leader.

The whole craze is a bit looney if you ask me.

Being in my 20's and having many of the characteristics found in many of the definitions of the "emergents", one of my co-workers makes a point of filling me in on the latest "emergent" buzz. Just this last week he told me the color purple is apparently an emergent thing. Go figure.

I've also recently heard that a large church in Southern California is considering a redesign of its main sanctuary to appeal to the emergents. This involves moving the stage to the center of the sanctuary, and best of all...installing fog machines and laser lights.

Amazing isn't it?

Perhaps we should create the "Emergent Pastor in a Box" Kit...a few candles, some incense, a stick-on soul patch...throw in a copy of McLaren's book and you've got yourself all it takes to be a hip Emergent Pastor and reach today's youth. Right?

I feel like so many are totally missing the point. Heck, maybe I am too. But here's what I see in this group being called The Emerging Church.

I see a lot of people that are hungry for Jesus.

Oops...did I make too simple?

Again, I see people that are truly hungry for a real relationship with Jesus...that are craving the person of Jesus...ONLY Jesus.

They are not craving candles and couches. They are not craving a brilliant, articulate pastor to idolize. They are not craving religious systems. They are not craving a slick, polished Sunday morning performance. They are craving Jesus.

At it's core, that's it.

I think most of the definitions and characteristics attributed to the "Emerging Church" are really just the types of things you might expect to flow out of authentic relationship with Jesus.

For starters, worship would be central. Someone in relationship with Jesus would certainly want to praise Him with all that they are. If they're musically inclined, they might sing praises or be inspired to write worshipful songs. If they paint, they might paint for God's glory. If they dance, they may express their worship through dance. The more they know Jesus, they would intensely, even fiercely, worship Him.

Prayer would also be quite important, since a relationship with Jesus (as with any intimate relationship) wouldn't really exist if you didn't commune together. With such a big focus on prayer and worship, creating an atmosphere conducive to these things would be helpful. Rigid pews focused on a pulpit might not be a part of this atmosphere, but comfortable seating scattered about, lower-lighting (candles even?), and aesthetically-pleasing artwork might be a part of it.

The deeper they go in their relationship with Jesus, the more they would long for greater depth in their worship of Him. If they were disillusioned with much of the church culture of the day, they may explore some of the rich history and liturgy of the church, finding great encouragement in the depth with which past generations prayed and worshipped.

You would also expect someone in authentic relationship with Jesus to live a life that loudly declares that Jesus is alive. A community of such people would draw great attention to themselves, simply because of how differently they lived when compared to those around them. They might focus heavily on social justice, knowing that faith without works is dead. They may look at Jesus and see how He acted on earth...visibly demonstrating his love to everyone he encountered.

Relationship with Jesus would also result in a deep love for all who are a part of His body...the body of Christ. There would be a hunger to live intentionally in community with the body. And knowing that the hand cannot say to the eye "I don't need you", they might be especially characterized by their openness to and love for the body parts that are very different from them. They would recognize that each part of the body plays a vital role in the body's function. They may even turn away from modern church leadership structures, believing that each person is integral to the health of the body, and putting certain people on pedestals and expecting them to do the work of multiple body parts could harm the body.

I think all of these traits flow back to a very real desire for intimacy with Jesus.

And it's important to note, this is nothing new! I think it's a bit crazy to try and assign a label like "emergents" or "postmoderns" to this ambiguous category of people. There are certainly a lot of younger folks in the category, but it really runs the gamut of ages. The point is, people everywhere are craving Jesus. Some of the systems that have been setup in the church may hinder people coming into deep, authentic relationship with Jesus, so other forms of worship and life as the body of Christ are "emerging".

There isn't really one category of people we can put a label on. There isn't one complete laundry list of traits of this group. And there aren't any particular leaders. There is a growing number of people who really want to know Jesus intimately.

How they live out that relationship will take many forms, some similar to what we're used to, while other forms may look very different. Let us praise God for this pure hunger for the one who alone can satisfy. It's a hunger that has been emerging in people for centuries, and may it continue to emerge in the centuries to come!

If you are interested in learning more about this "conversation", I highly recommend Robert Webber's The Younger Evangelicals. This Wikipedia article may also be helpful. But whatever you read, remember that at it's core, it isn't about a label or some list of characteristics...it's about people genuinely hungry for relationship with Jesus.